Title : Ship Arrest Conventions of 1952 and 1999: Disappointments for Maritime Claimant


Authors : Md. Rizwanul Islam


Journal Article Title: Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce Volume Number: 38 Publication Year : 2007 Issue Number: 1
Index: other (HeinOnline, LexisNexis ,Westlaw) Ranking: C ISSN (Print): 00222418 Publisher Name: Jeffrey F. Minnear / Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce
Pages : 75–81
Funding Information:
Funding Source : None
Other Information:
Direct Sustainable Development Goals :
SDG9 Industry, Innovation & Infrastructure
SDG16 Peace, Justice & Strong Institutions
Indirect Sustainable Development Goals :
SDG8 Decent Work & Economic Growth
SDG17 Partnership for the Goals
Sustainable Development Sub Goals :
Develop quality, sustainable infrastructure
Promote rule of law and equal access to justice
Develop accountable and transparent institutions
Achieve higher levels of economic productivity through diversification, technological upgrading and
Impact statement: This article critically examines the International Conventions on Ship Arrest adopted in 1952 and 1999 and argues that both conventions inadequately protect maritime claimants. The author analyzes how limitations in ship arrest procedures may disadvantage parties seeking to enforce maritime claims, particularly in international shipping disputes. By evaluating the legal and practical shortcomings of these conventions, the article contributes to discussions on maritime law reform, international commercial dispute resolution, and the effectiveness of global shipping regulations. The study is relevant to maritime lawyers, policymakers, shipping industry professionals, and scholars of international trade law. Collaboration: None Keywords: ship arrest, maritime law, maritime claims, international conventions, shipping disputes, admiralty law, maritime commerce, shi