| Impact statement: This chapter critically analyses quasi-legislative judicial directives issued by the Supreme Court of Bangladesh and evaluates their constitutional legitimacy and institutional implications. By examining the boundaries between judicial interpretation and lawmaking, the chapter contributes to strengthening constitutional accountability, separation of powers, and institutional integrity. The work advances understanding of judicial remedies within evolving constitutional frameworks and supports SDG 16 by promoting rule-of-law principles and strong, accountable institutions. |
Collaboration: None |
Keywords: proportionality doctrine, constitutional review, judicial scrutiny, Bangladesh |
